Photography is fascinating because it captures an instant of time that would normally slip away, and preserves it for us to appreciate more fully. This ‘instant’ is often a 60th of a second, but I have long been a fan of the art work by Michael Wesely who increases this ‘instant’ up to 3 years. Which gives a new view all together of our world. Some of his work can be seen here.
Working as Lighting TD, I am fascinated in what happens to the illumination of a scene and subject over this time. You would really have to think of the resulting photograph as even more of a canvas, being very deliberate about your exposure and the subject of the photograph. You can’t just judge your composition with what you have in front of you right now, but with everything that will be in view of the camera over the entire exposure. The trajectory of the sun, how the shadows will move across the image, the way an object will look with indirect lighting, expected changes in the landscape, the flow of motion.
I have started to have a play with these things myself, though not with the continuous capture like Michael achieves in his images. I’m curious mainly with the passage of light through an entire day, and I’ll initially try and capture that digitally. I have a few things to work out; the first of which is how far down I can stop my camera, and what length of exposure I can get from that. From there, I will be able to work out how many photos I will need over a given period, to give me the smoothest result. If the shutter is really fast, then I will need hundred’s of thousands of images. But if I can get it really slow, I may only need hundreds.
I plan to stitch the images with a technique called Frame Averaging which can be as simple as dividing a series of images by the total amount, and then adding them back together to generate a new image. So if I was to take a photo every 30 seconds (at a 60th of a second), for an hour, I would get 120 images. Then divide each image by 120 (total amount of images taken), and adding all these new images back together (for now ignoring all gamma and colour space issues) to create a new image. The problem here is that if we are only taking a snapshot of a 60th of a second, the edges of shadows will still be too defined. Possibly fanning across the image. So it’s important to stop the camera down as much as possible. It would be great to have the shutter open for 29 seconds in the 30 second period.
Enough prattle. Here are some images from my initial tests. These were 4 second exposures taken over 3 hour periods, at 30 second intervals. The resulting images seem to be moving toward grey, and don’t have the highlights I’m expecting. I think this is because I’m not stripping the srgb colour space before doing the conversion, in my frame addition script. I’ll address this soon enough.
Posted in Image Averaging, Photography | No Comments »